No. If a delivery initially appears to qualify as a Wide but the umpire establishes a No-ball call, the official classification is No-ball, not two separate extras. The two labels should not be stacked as independent outcomes.
How the classification works
The controlling principle is that a No-ball overrides a Wide at any time. Therefore, a provisional Wide label in a hypothetical record must be corrected when the official decision becomes No-ball. This is a classification rule, not a statement that every detail of the delivery has ended. See the MCC Law 21 No-ball guidance for the relevant rule scope.
Hypothetical example
Situation: The ball travels beyond the batter’s normal reach, so a screen first shows “Wide”. During the same delivery, the umpire identifies a No-ball offence and calls No-ball. The final record should be:
| Initial display | Official call | Final label |
|---|---|---|
| Wide | No-ball | No-ball only |
The practical output is therefore one No-ball classification, rather than one No-ball plus one Wide. This example does not provide enough information to calculate total runs: bat contact, running, boundaries, and other scoring facts are unknown. Keep those missing fields separate from the corrected delivery category; an accurate label is not a complete score calculation.
Classification is not the same as a dead ball
The No-ball call does not, by itself, make the ball dead. Play may therefore continue under the applicable laws, even though the delivery has already been classified as a No-ball. The No-ball also does not count as one of the over’s valid balls. Those consequences are separate from deciding whether the Wide label remains.
Nothing in this narrow example establishes a free-hit outcome, a particular run total, or a competition-specific scoring display. Playing conditions may modify how a competition presents or applies details, so the relevant competition rules should be checked where they differ from the Laws.